WO2016207266A1 - Process to prepare phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds - Google Patents

Process to prepare phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2016207266A1
WO2016207266A1 PCT/EP2016/064501 EP2016064501W WO2016207266A1 WO 2016207266 A1 WO2016207266 A1 WO 2016207266A1 EP 2016064501 W EP2016064501 W EP 2016064501W WO 2016207266 A1 WO2016207266 A1 WO 2016207266A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
alkali metal
hbed
reaction mixture
phenol
diacetic acid
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/EP2016/064501
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Adrianus Maria Reichwein
Hubertus Johannes JONGEN
Marjolein GROOTE
Original Assignee
Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V. filed Critical Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V.
Priority to PL16731168T priority Critical patent/PL3313813T3/en
Priority to MX2017016691A priority patent/MX2017016691A/en
Priority to US15/736,372 priority patent/US10472320B2/en
Priority to CN201680033895.6A priority patent/CN107743480B/en
Priority to EP16731168.7A priority patent/EP3313813B1/en
Priority to ES16731168T priority patent/ES2733466T3/en
Priority to CA2989973A priority patent/CA2989973C/en
Publication of WO2016207266A1 publication Critical patent/WO2016207266A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07C—ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS
    • C07C227/00—Preparation of compounds containing amino and carboxyl groups bound to the same carbon skeleton
    • C07C227/14—Preparation of compounds containing amino and carboxyl groups bound to the same carbon skeleton from compounds containing already amino and carboxyl groups or derivatives thereof
    • C07C227/18—Preparation of compounds containing amino and carboxyl groups bound to the same carbon skeleton from compounds containing already amino and carboxyl groups or derivatives thereof by reactions involving amino or carboxyl groups, e.g. hydrolysis of esters or amides, by formation of halides, salts or esters
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N37/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic compounds containing a carbon atom having three bonds to hetero atoms with at the most two bonds to halogen, e.g. carboxylic acids
    • A01N37/44—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing organic compounds containing a carbon atom having three bonds to hetero atoms with at the most two bonds to halogen, e.g. carboxylic acids containing at least one carboxylic group or a thio analogue, or a derivative thereof, and a nitrogen atom attached to the same carbon skeleton by a single or double bond, this nitrogen atom not being a member of a derivative or of a thio analogue of a carboxylic group, e.g. amino-carboxylic acids
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A01—AGRICULTURE; FORESTRY; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; HUNTING; TRAPPING; FISHING
    • A01N—PRESERVATION OF BODIES OF HUMANS OR ANIMALS OR PLANTS OR PARTS THEREOF; BIOCIDES, e.g. AS DISINFECTANTS, AS PESTICIDES OR AS HERBICIDES; PEST REPELLANTS OR ATTRACTANTS; PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
    • A01N59/00—Biocides, pest repellants or attractants, or plant growth regulators containing elements or inorganic compounds
    • A01N59/16—Heavy metals; Compounds thereof
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07C—ACYCLIC OR CARBOCYCLIC COMPOUNDS
    • C07C227/00—Preparation of compounds containing amino and carboxyl groups bound to the same carbon skeleton
    • C07C227/14—Preparation of compounds containing amino and carboxyl groups bound to the same carbon skeleton from compounds containing already amino and carboxyl groups or derivatives thereof
    • C07C227/16—Preparation of compounds containing amino and carboxyl groups bound to the same carbon skeleton from compounds containing already amino and carboxyl groups or derivatives thereof by reactions not involving the amino or carboxyl groups

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process to prepare phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds and to phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds obtainable with the process.
  • Phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds are known in the art.
  • An example of a phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compound is ⁇ , ⁇ '- di(2- hydroxybenzyl)ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid, often abbreviated as HBED, though more specifically this molecule is ⁇ , ⁇ -HBED.
  • the isomers o,p- and p,p- HBED may also be formed in HBED production processes, though in significantly smaller amounts. Preparation methods for this molecule are described in several documents such as in WO 2009/037235 and US 3,632,637.
  • WO 2009/037235 involves a reductive amination of glyoxylic acid with a salan compound that is made by reacting ethylenediamine with salicylaldehyde to give HBED isolated as a dry HCI solid.
  • This reaction requires quite a number of steps, however, many of them of considerable complexity, and a number attended with high costs. These steps are, among others, filtering off the hydrogenation catalyst, working with H2, which requires safety measures, working under increased pressure, and using an excess of glyoxylic acid and amine proton acceptor, both of which need to be recycled before the formed HBED can be isolated in a crystalline form.
  • the crystals need to be dissolved again before they can be contacted with iron cations and next be dried again in the iron chelated form.
  • the alkali metal salts of HBED are obtained as an aqueous solution by titrating HBED in the acidic form with 3 molar equivalents of either NaOH or KOH, which gives HBED as the full sodium and potassium salts, respectively.
  • WO '235 is silent about any advantages of choosing potassium as a counterion.
  • US 2,967,196 discloses a reaction wherein formaldehyde is added to an alkaline solution of ethylenediamine diacetic acid in methanol to which a para-substituted phenol such as p-cresol, p-phenolsulfonic acid or p-hydroxybenzoic acid is added. This is disclosed to be done to avoid a reaction of ethylenediamine diacetic acid with an o-chloromethyl derivative, which is said to be the only way to ensure the hydroxyl group ending up ortho to the ethylenediamine part of the molecule.
  • the reaction conditions in this document involve reflux conditions, i.e. relatively high temperatures, and the reaction is preferably performed at an alkaline pH of between 8 and 10, by adding high amounts of either sodium or potassium hydroxide as a base.
  • US'196 does not recommend any alkali metal in particular for its process.
  • the present invention now provides a process to prepare N,N'-di(2-hydroxybenzyl) ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid and salts thereof (HBED) comprising a reaction between formaldehyde, ethylenediamine diacetic acid or a salt thereof (EDDA), and phenol, wherein the reaction mixture contains 0.2 to 1 .1 molar equivalents of alkali metal ions on the basis of the molar amount of EDDA and the reaction mixture is subsequently processed by a step in which at least part of the organic compounds other than the formed HBED are removed from the reaction mixture and optionally recycled, during which step 50-100% of the alkali metal ions in the reaction mixture are potassium ions.
  • the reaction between formaldehyde, EDDA and phenol is performed at a pH of between 3 and 7 and a temperature below 60°C
  • the present invention also provides the alkali metal-containing HBED products (full or partial salts and complexes that contain alkali metal as a cation) obtainable by the present invention wherein more than 50% but less than 100% of the alkali metal ions is potassium.
  • these products are different in the sense that they have another isomers distribution, contain low amounts of by-products and are an alkali metal-functional salt of HBED or derivative thereof wherein more than 50% but less than 100% of the alkali metal ions are potassium, such as a predominantly potassium-functional complex of HBED, like FeK-HBED, CuK 2 -HBED, ZnK 2 -HBED, MnK 2 -HBED, MnK- HBED, in either dissolved or dry form. Additionally, the products of the process of the invention were found easy to dry.
  • the compounds covered by the present invention contrary to those compounds contain a combination of potassium and at least one further alkali metal.
  • the products of the present invention though different from those disclosed in the above 3 documents, can equally be used in similar applications, such as water softening, pulp and paper production, bleaching, detergents. Most preferably, they are used in micronutrient formulations.
  • the three reactants can be added together using different orders of steps.
  • the phenol reactant is used as a liquid - and in many embodiments is used in an excess amount - it is possible to either make a premix of the EDDA and the phenol and next add this mixture to the formaldehyde or vice versa, or to make a premix of the phenol and formaldehyde and add this premix to the EDDA or vice versa, and then perform the reaction under the above pH, alkali metal load, and temperature conditions.
  • Another even more preferred way of performing the process is first making an adduct of the EDDA and formaldehyde and next reacting this adduct with the phenol under the mentioned pH, alkali metal load, and temperature conditions. This latter embodiment has as an advantage that only liquids need to be reacted with one another, which provides for easier dosing to a reactor, for example by simple pumping of the components.
  • the invention in embodiments also covers a process to prepare potassium- functional N,N'-di(2-hydroxybenzyl) ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid salts (HBED) or derivatives thereof comprising a first step wherein a reaction is performed between formaldehyde and ethylenediamine diacetic acid or a salt thereof to give an adduct, and a second step wherein the adduct of formaldehyde and ethylenediamine diacetic acid or a salt thereof is reacted with phenol while ensuring that the pH is between 3 and 7 and the temperature is below 60°C; or such a process comprising a first step of preparing a mixture comprising phenol and ethylenediamine diacetic acid or a salt thereof, and a second step of reacting the EDDA and phenol in this mixture with formaldehyde at a pH of between 3 and 7 and a temperature of below 60°C; or such a process comprising a first step of preparing
  • US 4,338,460 discloses a process for preparing phenolic propylenediamine diacetic acid compounds and that in this document an acidic pH of 2 to 6 is disclosed to be suitable for the production of di-ortho hydroxybenzyl propylenediamine diacetic acid products.
  • an acidic pH of 2 to 6 is disclosed to be suitable for the production of di-ortho hydroxybenzyl propylenediamine diacetic acid products.
  • the results obtained for propylenediamine diacetic acid could not be repeated for ethylenediamine diacetic acid products.
  • Example 12 where ethylene equivalents were used, a ring closure was found to take place when reacting ethylenediamine ⁇ , ⁇ ' diacetic acid, formaldehyde and phenol in a water/methanol solution.
  • the pH during the process is between 3 and 7, and preferably between 4 and 7; it was even found to be more preferable to maintain the pH at a value of at least 5 for good yield and selectivity. In the process of the present invention a pH below 3 was found to be detrimental.
  • the EDDA reactant is added as a solution in water, but water can equally well be present with the formaldehyde reactant or be added separately to the reaction mixture.
  • the alkali metal ions in embodiments are added to the reaction mixture by the addition of an alkali metal hydroxide or by adding the EDDA component as an ethylenediamine diacetate alkali metal salt or as an aqueous solution containing alkali metal ions in the right amount.
  • the alkali metal in principle only needs to be present in the reaction mixture when the 3 rd component is present and the reaction to give HBED begins: however, the alkali metal ions may be added to the earlier mixture as well.
  • the pH is adjusted to a value of between 3 and 7 by the addition of an alkali metal hydroxide, more preferably in an amount of between 0.2 and 1.1 molar equivalents on the basis of the molar amount of ethylenediamine diacetic acid or - which is effectively the same - by adding the EDDA component as an ethylenediamine diacetate salt or aqueous solution containing 0.2 to 1.1 equivalents of an alkali metal countercation. More preferably, the alkali metal is present in 0.8-1.0 molar equivalent on EDDA moles, even more preferably 0.85- 0.98 molar equivalent. In all the above cases it is the most efficient and thus preferred to have 50 to 100% of the alkali metal molar amount immediately be potassium.
  • alkali metal is added to the reaction mixture between the step in which the EDDA, phenol and formaldehyde are reacted to HBED and the processing step (in some instances causing an increase of the pH to higher than 7); this can be potassium but also may be another alkali metal, as long as the molar amount of potassium on total alkali metal moles is in the right molar range of 50- 100% during the processing step.
  • the molar amount of potassium on total alkali metal moles is in the range 60 to 99%, even more preferably 70 to 98% for both the process and the products obtainable therewith.
  • the process of the present invention contains a next step wherein the product obtained is converted to a derivative of the salt such as the acid, another salt or metal complex.
  • a derivative of the salt such as the acid, another salt or metal complex.
  • the product of the process initially will be an alkali metal salt of HBED wherein 50-100% of these alkali metal ions are potassium ions
  • converting to another salt also covers a step of adding more base, such as potassium hydroxide, and converting the HBED salt to one containing more equivalents of, potassium, countercations, or adding an acid and replacing part of the alkali metal, potassium, ions with protons.
  • the prepared HBED is contacted with metal cations to form a chelate complex, wherein in even more preferred embodiments these metals are chosen from the group of iron, zinc, manganese and copper. All the above conversions are within the skills of someone skilled in the art.
  • the process contains an additional step of removing unreacted starting materials and/or by-products, a drying step, or both.
  • This step and the above step of converting the product to an acid, salt or complex can be performed in any order.
  • the process of the invention comprises a processing step in which organic compounds are at least partly removed, and optionally recycled, such as an excess of phenol or formaldehyde that is used.
  • a preferred way of at least partly removing these organic compounds is performing an extraction step with or without recycling the organic fraction back into the process.
  • the HBED product will for the major part be collected in the aqueous phase.
  • the HBED product or derivative, such as the metal complex made from the HBED product in some embodiments can be dried.
  • the drying step can be performed by any drying method that a skilled person is aware of, such as drum drying, solvent evaporation, crystallization, spray drying, and in a preferred embodiment is a spray drying step.
  • Spray drying is preferably done in a spray drying apparatus to which the - in most instances aqueous - solution or slurry and the air are passed concurrently or countercurrently, with more preferably a temperature gradient between the aqueous solution and the incoming air in the range from 70 to 350°C, by atomizing the aqueous solution into fine liquid droplets.
  • the seeds in one embodiment have an upper limit for an average particle diameter lower by at least a factor of 2 than the lower limit of an average particle diameter of the powder obtained by the spray drying process.
  • the fraction of the seeds is from 0.1 to 50 % by weight, preferably 0.1 to 20% by weight, based on the weight of the powder obtained by the process.
  • Another advantage of the present invention is that when a drying step is added, such as in preferred embodiments a spray drying step, the process leads to solid materials with improved properties, like improved storage and handling properties, wherein the drying step itself also proceeds without any problems such as dusting, caking, uneven particle sizes, plugging of the spray nozzle.
  • the temperature during the process is between 0 and 60°C, preferably between 20 and 50°C, even more preferably between 30 and 50°C.
  • the molar ratio of phenol : ethylenediamine diacetic acid (or a salt thereof) is higher than 8:1 , more preferably up to 20:1 ; most preferably it is between 10:1 and 14:1. It is also preferred to perform the reaction in phenol as a solvent, suitably in the substantial or full absence of other solvents than water. This makes it possible to avoid contamination with other compounds.
  • the unreacted phenol can be recycled without any problems, so in a more preferred embodiment phenol is used as a (main) solvent and the process contains a step of recycling unreacted solvent.
  • the molar ratio of formaldehyde : ethylenediamine diacetic acid (or a salt thereof) is between 1.8 : 1 and 2.2 : 1. More than 2.2 molar equivalents of formaldehyde will give side reactions with phenol (which is also preferably dosed in a molar excess). In yet another preferred embodiment it is ensured that the components, most importantly the EDDA, are fully dissolved in the reaction mixture during the process, which provides for a homogeneous reaction mixture that can be easily stirred and also leads to higher yields and less side products.
  • Example 1 HBED production and processing with 100% of alkali metal ions being potassium
  • the reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 76.1 g of water and 47.4 g of 45.8% potassium hydroxide solution (0.387 mole) The pH increased to about 9.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (250 ml and 3 times 125 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. The extracted aqueous ligand solution had a pH of about 10.5 and remained clear without the formation of any precipitates. The concentration of ⁇ , ⁇ -HBED in the extracted aqueous ligand solution was approximately 26% expressed as H4-o,o-HBED. Comparative example 1. Production of HBED and processing of HBED with 0% of the alkali metal ions being potassium
  • the reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 41.1 g of water and 33.5 g 50.0% NaOH (0.419 mole). The pH increased to about 9.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (250 ml and 3 times 125 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. The extracted aqueous ligand solution had a pH of about 10.5 and soon a large amount of precipitate was formed, which was identified as Na2H2-o,o-HBED. The remaining concentration of ⁇ , ⁇ -HBED in solution was approximately 6.1 % expressed as H4-o,o-HBED.
  • the reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 21.2 g of 20.5% KOH (0.077 mole) and 20.7 g of 15.0% NaOH (0.078 mole). The pH increased to about 9.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (75 ml and 3 times 50 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. Quickly after the fourth extraction, the aqueous ligand solution turned turbid and a lot of product precipitated. 204.7 g of water were added to obtain a clear ligand solution again. The concentration of 0,0-HBED was reduced to 9.6% expressed as H4-o,o-HBED by the required dilution.
  • the reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 72.0 g of 14.9% sodium hydroxide solution (0.268 mole). The pH increased to about 10. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (100 ml and 3 times 50 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. The extracted aqueous ligand solution had a pH of about 12.5. Soon after the fourth extraction, the aqueous ligand solution turned turbid and a lot of product precipitated.
  • Example 2 Production of HBED and processing of HBED with 50% of alkali metal ions being potassium
  • the reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 18.0 g of 21.1 % potassium hydroxide solution (0.068 mole) and 53.9 g of 14.9% sodium hydroxide solution (0.201 mole). The pH increased to about 10.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (100 ml and 3 times 50 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. The extracted aqueous ligand solution had a pH of about 12.5. After the last extraction, the aqueous ligand solution became slightly turbid, but the solution could still be handled easily. The concentration of ⁇ , ⁇ -HBED in the extracted aqueous ligand solution was approximately 23% expressed as H4-o,o- HBED.
  • the reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 6.8 g of 20.5% KOH (0.025 mole) and 34.0 g of 15.0% NaOH (0.128 mole). The pH increased to about 9.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (75 ml and 3 times 50 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. After the last extraction, the aqueous ligand solution became slightly turbid, but the solution could still be handled easily. The concentration of ⁇ , ⁇ -HBED in the extracted aqueous ligand solution was approximately 22% expressed as H4-o,o-HBED.
  • Example 4 Production of HBED and processing of HBED with 58% of alkali metal ions being potassium 9.0 g of a 50.0% sodium hydroxide solution (0.1 13 mole) were added to a slurry of 20.8 g of 99% ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid (0.1 17 mole) in 46.1 g of water. 16.4 g of a 42.4% formaldehyde solution (0.232 mole) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for one hour to obtain a clear solution. This solution was added in one go to 148.6 g of 88.9% phenol (1.40 moles) and the container was washed with an additional 9.0 g of water. The reaction mixture was stirred at 35°C for 24 h, during which time the pH increased from about 5 to about 6. After 24 h, ⁇ , ⁇ -HBED was obtained in 81 .9% yield according to HPLC (EN 13368-2:2012).
  • the reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 42.3 g of 20.5% KOH (0.155 mole). The pH increased to about 9.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (75 ml and 3 times 50 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. The extracted aqueous ligand solution remained clear without the formation of any precipitates. The concentration of ⁇ , ⁇ -HBED in the extracted aqueous ligand solution was approximately 22% expressed as H4-o,o-HBED.
  • Example 5 Production of HBED and processing of HBED with 59% of alkali metal ions being potassium 30.7 g of a 20.5% potassium hydroxide solution (0.1 12 mole) were added to a slurry of 20.8 g of 99% ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid (0.1 17 mole) in 22.0 g of water. 16.5 g of a 42.4% formaldehyde solution (0.233 mole) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for one hour to obtain a clear solution. This solution was added in one go to 148.3 g of 88.9% phenol (1 .40 mole) and the container was washed with an additional 1 1.8 g of water. The reaction mixture was stirred at 35°C for 24 h, during which time the pH increased from about 5.5 to about 6. After 24 h, ⁇ , ⁇ -HBED was obtained in 83.4% yield according to HPLC (EN 13368-2:2012).
  • the reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 1 1.0 g of 20.5% KOH (0.040 mole) and 29.9 g of 15.0% NaOH (0.1 12 mole). The pH increased to about 9.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (75 ml and 3 times 50 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. The extracted aqueous ligand solution remained clear without the formation of any precipitates. The concentration of ⁇ , ⁇ -HBED in the extracted aqueous ligand solution was approximately 22% expressed as H4-o,o-HBED.
  • the reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 35.7 g of 21.1 % potassium hydroxide solution (0.134 mole) and 36.1 g of 14.9% sodium hydroxide solution (0.134 mole). The pH increased to about 10.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (85 ml and 3 times 50 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. The extracted aqueous ligand solution had a pH of about 12.5 and remained clear without the formation of any precipitates. The concentration of o,o- HBED in the extracted aqueous ligand solution was approximately 22% expressed as H4-o,o-HBED
  • Example 7 Production of HBED and processing of HBED with 85% of alkali metal ions being potassium 30.7 g of a 20.5% potassium hydroxide solution (0.1 12 mole) were added to a slurry of 20.8 g of 99% ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid (0.1 17 mole) in 22.0 g of water. 16.5 g of a 42.4% formaldehyde solution (0.233 mole) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for one hour to obtain a clear solution. This solution was added in one go to 148.3 g of 88.9% phenol (1 .40 moles) and the container was washed with an additional 1 1.8 g of water. The reaction mixture was stirred at 35°C for 24 h, during which time the pH increased from about 5.5 to about 6. After 24 h, ⁇ , ⁇ -HBED was obtained in 83.4% yield according to HPLC (EN 13368-2:2012).
  • the reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 1 1.0 g of 20.5% KOH (0.040 mole) and 6.8 g of 15.0% NaOH (0.026 mole). The pH increased to about 8.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (75 ml and 3 times 50 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. The extracted aqueous ligand solution remained clear without the formation of any precipitates. The concentration of ⁇ , ⁇ -HBED in the extracted aqueous ligand solution was approximately 25% expressed as H4-o,o-HBED.
  • Example 8 Use of HBED products of the invention as a micronutrient A solution of 19.1 g of FeCI3.6H20 (0.071 mole) in 9.6 g of water (13.8% Fe m/m) was added to 100 g of the extracted HBED ligand solution from Example 7 (25% expressed as H4-o,o-HBED, 0.064 mole ⁇ , ⁇ -HBED). The pH of the solution was carefully adjusted to pH 8 with a 20.5% KOH solution. The resulting slurry was spray dried to obtain a solid containing 6.4% Fe chelated by o,o-HBED.

Abstract

The present invention relates to a process to prepare N,N'-di(2-hydroxybenzyl) ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid and salts thereof (HBED) comprising a reaction between formaldehyde, ethylenediamine diacetic acid or a salt thereof (EDDA) and phenol, wherein the reaction mixture contains 0.2 to 1.1 molar equivalents of alkali metal ions on the basis of the molar amount of EDDA and the reaction mixture is processed by a step in which at least part of the organic compounds other than the formed HBED are removed from the reaction mixture, and optionally recycled, during which step at least 50% and up to and including 100% of the alkali metal ions in the reaction mixture are potassium ions, to products obtainable by such process and their use.

Description

Process to prepare phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds
The present invention relates to a process to prepare phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds and to phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds obtainable with the process.
Phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds are known in the art. An example of a phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compound is Ν,Ν'- di(2- hydroxybenzyl)ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid, often abbreviated as HBED, though more specifically this molecule is ο,ο-HBED. The isomers o,p- and p,p- HBED may also be formed in HBED production processes, though in significantly smaller amounts. Preparation methods for this molecule are described in several documents such as in WO 2009/037235 and US 3,632,637. The process of WO 2009/037235 involves a reductive amination of glyoxylic acid with a salan compound that is made by reacting ethylenediamine with salicylaldehyde to give HBED isolated as a dry HCI solid. This reaction requires quite a number of steps, however, many of them of considerable complexity, and a number attended with high costs. These steps are, among others, filtering off the hydrogenation catalyst, working with H2, which requires safety measures, working under increased pressure, and using an excess of glyoxylic acid and amine proton acceptor, both of which need to be recycled before the formed HBED can be isolated in a crystalline form. Moreover, to prepare the iron chelate of HBED the crystals need to be dissolved again before they can be contacted with iron cations and next be dried again in the iron chelated form. The alkali metal salts of HBED are obtained as an aqueous solution by titrating HBED in the acidic form with 3 molar equivalents of either NaOH or KOH, which gives HBED as the full sodium and potassium salts, respectively. WO '235 is silent about any advantages of choosing potassium as a counterion.
The process of US 3,632,637 involves reacting ethylenediamine diacetic acid with o-acetoxybenzyl halogenide, such as bromide or chloride. Though in general the HBED is said to be obtainable as an acid, a sodium, potassium or ammonium salt, the document only discloses the provision of HBED as a solid in acidic form and as a sodium salt.
In J.G. Wilson, "phenolic analogues of aminocarboxylic acid ligands for 99mTc. II* Synthesis and characterization of N,N'-ethylenebis[N-(o-hydroxybenzyl glycines)] ehbg", Aust J Chem 1988, 41 , 173-182, it is described that the above process of US 3,632,637 is undesirable as it is marred by the formation of resinous polymeric by-products, creating a search for new preparation processes. In this same document reference is made to US 2,967,196 as giving further preparation methods for making phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acids.
US 2,967,196 discloses a reaction wherein formaldehyde is added to an alkaline solution of ethylenediamine diacetic acid in methanol to which a para-substituted phenol such as p-cresol, p-phenolsulfonic acid or p-hydroxybenzoic acid is added. This is disclosed to be done to avoid a reaction of ethylenediamine diacetic acid with an o-chloromethyl derivative, which is said to be the only way to ensure the hydroxyl group ending up ortho to the ethylenediamine part of the molecule. The reaction conditions in this document involve reflux conditions, i.e. relatively high temperatures, and the reaction is preferably performed at an alkaline pH of between 8 and 10, by adding high amounts of either sodium or potassium hydroxide as a base. US'196 does not recommend any alkali metal in particular for its process.
It is also confirmed in the above publication of J.G. Wilson that the reaction disclosed in US 2,967,196 is not successful for unsubstituted phenols for the same ortho, para-position reason as referred to in US Ί 96.
However, there is a need in the art to provide a simple process to make HBED and derivatives thereof wherein ethylenediamine diacetic acid can be reacted with formaldehyde and phenol, in which the product is formed in good yield and in high purity. The present invention now provides a process to prepare N,N'-di(2-hydroxybenzyl) ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid and salts thereof (HBED) comprising a reaction between formaldehyde, ethylenediamine diacetic acid or a salt thereof (EDDA), and phenol, wherein the reaction mixture contains 0.2 to 1 .1 molar equivalents of alkali metal ions on the basis of the molar amount of EDDA and the reaction mixture is subsequently processed by a step in which at least part of the organic compounds other than the formed HBED are removed from the reaction mixture and optionally recycled, during which step 50-100% of the alkali metal ions in the reaction mixture are potassium ions. Preferably, the reaction between formaldehyde, EDDA and phenol is performed at a pH of between 3 and 7 and a temperature below 60°C
Working within the scope of the process of the present invention it has been found possible to make HBED with a good selectivity for the ortho (to hydroxyl) position and a high yield of product in a limited number of steps, using cheap materials, wherein the reaction steps are easy to control because no highly exothermic steps are involved, no high pressure needs to be applied and not too hazardous materials are used, wherein pH control is relatively straightforward, wherein the reaction mixture is also easy to handle throughout the reaction, as it is homogeneous, and wherein the obtained HBED with 50-100% potassium as a countercation proved surprisingly easy to purify from the other reaction products and side products in a processing step, for example using an extraction step.
The present invention also provides the alkali metal-containing HBED products (full or partial salts and complexes that contain alkali metal as a cation) obtainable by the present invention wherein more than 50% but less than 100% of the alkali metal ions is potassium. It was found that as they were obtained by a different process, these products are different in the sense that they have another isomers distribution, contain low amounts of by-products and are an alkali metal-functional salt of HBED or derivative thereof wherein more than 50% but less than 100% of the alkali metal ions are potassium, such as a predominantly potassium-functional complex of HBED, like FeK-HBED, CuK2-HBED, ZnK2-HBED, MnK2-HBED, MnK- HBED, in either dissolved or dry form. Additionally, the products of the process of the invention were found easy to dry. It should be noted that WO 2009/037235, WO 01/461 14 and the disclosure of M A Kean et al: "Iron chelating agents and their effects on the growth of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Chlorella vulgaris, Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Spirulina platensis in comparison to Fe-EDTA", Journal of Algal Biomass Utilization, 2015, 6 (1 ), 1 January 2015, pages 56-73, disclose either potassium salts or metal-potassium complexes of HBED in which the only alkali metal is potassium. The compounds covered by the present invention contrary to those compounds contain a combination of potassium and at least one further alkali metal. The products of the present invention, though different from those disclosed in the above 3 documents, can equally be used in similar applications, such as water softening, pulp and paper production, bleaching, detergents. Most preferably, they are used in micronutrient formulations.
In the process of the present invention the three reactants can be added together using different orders of steps. As the phenol reactant is used as a liquid - and in many embodiments is used in an excess amount - it is possible to either make a premix of the EDDA and the phenol and next add this mixture to the formaldehyde or vice versa, or to make a premix of the phenol and formaldehyde and add this premix to the EDDA or vice versa, and then perform the reaction under the above pH, alkali metal load, and temperature conditions. Another even more preferred way of performing the process is first making an adduct of the EDDA and formaldehyde and next reacting this adduct with the phenol under the mentioned pH, alkali metal load, and temperature conditions. This latter embodiment has as an advantage that only liquids need to be reacted with one another, which provides for easier dosing to a reactor, for example by simple pumping of the components.
Hence, the invention in embodiments also covers a process to prepare potassium- functional N,N'-di(2-hydroxybenzyl) ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid salts (HBED) or derivatives thereof comprising a first step wherein a reaction is performed between formaldehyde and ethylenediamine diacetic acid or a salt thereof to give an adduct, and a second step wherein the adduct of formaldehyde and ethylenediamine diacetic acid or a salt thereof is reacted with phenol while ensuring that the pH is between 3 and 7 and the temperature is below 60°C; or such a process comprising a first step of preparing a mixture comprising phenol and ethylenediamine diacetic acid or a salt thereof, and a second step of reacting the EDDA and phenol in this mixture with formaldehyde at a pH of between 3 and 7 and a temperature of below 60°C; or such a process comprising a first step of preparing a mixture comprising phenol and formaldehyde and a second step of reacting the phenol and formaldehyde in this mixture with ethylenediamine diacetic acid or a salt thereof at a pH of between 3 and 7 and a temperature of below 60°C, wherein in all the above embodiments of the process the reaction of the 3 components EDDA, phenol and formaldehyde is performed in a mixture that contains 0.2 to 1.1 molar equivalents of alkali metal ions on the basis of the molar amount of EDDA, and wherein the reaction mixture is subsequently processed by a step in which at least part of the organic compounds other than the formed HBED are removed from the reaction mixture and optionally recycled, during which step 50-100% of the alkali metal ions in the reaction mixture are potassium ions.
It may be noted that US 4,338,460 discloses a process for preparing phenolic propylenediamine diacetic acid compounds and that in this document an acidic pH of 2 to 6 is disclosed to be suitable for the production of di-ortho hydroxybenzyl propylenediamine diacetic acid products. However, in the examples of this same document it is demonstrated that the results obtained for propylenediamine diacetic acid could not be repeated for ethylenediamine diacetic acid products. In Example 12 where ethylene equivalents were used, a ring closure was found to take place when reacting ethylenediamine Ν,Ν' diacetic acid, formaldehyde and phenol in a water/methanol solution. The process of the present invention does not work properly for propylene diamine diacetic acid. Accordingly, one must conclude that reactions of ethylenediamine acetic acid with phenolic compounds and propylene diamine acetic acids with the same phenolic compounds are so essentially different that it will not be possible to predict reaction conditions for preparing HBED on the basis of what has been found in producing phenolic propylenediamine diacetic acid compounds. Furthermore, the fact that in Example 12 of US 4,338,460 no reaction to form HBED takes place is thought, without Applicant wishing to be bound to any theory, to be due to the fact that the reaction mixture contains no alkali metal ions, which results in the reactants being relatively insoluble in the employed solvent mixture.
The pH during the process is between 3 and 7, and preferably between 4 and 7; it was even found to be more preferable to maintain the pH at a value of at least 5 for good yield and selectivity. In the process of the present invention a pH below 3 was found to be detrimental.
Logically during the process water needs to be present as a solvent or co-solvent to be able to determine a pH. Preferably, the EDDA reactant is added as a solution in water, but water can equally well be present with the formaldehyde reactant or be added separately to the reaction mixture.
The alkali metal ions in embodiments are added to the reaction mixture by the addition of an alkali metal hydroxide or by adding the EDDA component as an ethylenediamine diacetate alkali metal salt or as an aqueous solution containing alkali metal ions in the right amount. When the process of the present invention proceeds by premixing 2 of the 3 components, followed by a step in which the 3rd component is added, the alkali metal in principle only needs to be present in the reaction mixture when the 3rd component is present and the reaction to give HBED begins: however, the alkali metal ions may be added to the earlier mixture as well. In most instances the pH is adjusted to a value of between 3 and 7 by the addition of an alkali metal hydroxide, more preferably in an amount of between 0.2 and 1.1 molar equivalents on the basis of the molar amount of ethylenediamine diacetic acid or - which is effectively the same - by adding the EDDA component as an ethylenediamine diacetate salt or aqueous solution containing 0.2 to 1.1 equivalents of an alkali metal countercation. More preferably, the alkali metal is present in 0.8-1.0 molar equivalent on EDDA moles, even more preferably 0.85- 0.98 molar equivalent. In all the above cases it is the most efficient and thus preferred to have 50 to 100% of the alkali metal molar amount immediately be potassium. It should be noted, however, that the above equivalents are depending on the purity of the raw materials during the reaction and their effect on the pH during the process. In an embodiment, further alkali metal is added to the reaction mixture between the step in which the EDDA, phenol and formaldehyde are reacted to HBED and the processing step (in some instances causing an increase of the pH to higher than 7); this can be potassium but also may be another alkali metal, as long as the molar amount of potassium on total alkali metal moles is in the right molar range of 50- 100% during the processing step. It is also possible to perform the earlier reaction between EDDA, phenol and formaldehyde in the presence of alkali metal containing a molar percentage of potassium outside the 50-100% on the total molar amount of alkali metal and to adjust the amount of potassium within this range by adding further potassium to the reaction mixture. For example, it is possible to perform the reaction of EDDA, phenol and formaldehyde in the presence of 0.2-1.1 equivalent of sodium ions and subsequently add an amount of potassium to the reaction mixture that is at least as high on a molar amount as the amount of sodium and still be capable of processing the reaction products in line with the process of the present invention. This is beneficial if the EDDA component used in the process of the present invention is for example only present as a sodium salt on the manufacturing site.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention the molar amount of potassium on total alkali metal moles is in the range 60 to 99%, even more preferably 70 to 98% for both the process and the products obtainable therewith.
In a preferred embodiment the process of the present invention contains a next step wherein the product obtained is converted to a derivative of the salt such as the acid, another salt or metal complex. As the product of the process initially will be an alkali metal salt of HBED wherein 50-100% of these alkali metal ions are potassium ions, converting to another salt also covers a step of adding more base, such as potassium hydroxide, and converting the HBED salt to one containing more equivalents of, potassium, countercations, or adding an acid and replacing part of the alkali metal, potassium, ions with protons. Most preferably, in a step following the processing step the prepared HBED is contacted with metal cations to form a chelate complex, wherein in even more preferred embodiments these metals are chosen from the group of iron, zinc, manganese and copper. All the above conversions are within the skills of someone skilled in the art.
In another preferred embodiment, the process contains an additional step of removing unreacted starting materials and/or by-products, a drying step, or both. This step and the above step of converting the product to an acid, salt or complex can be performed in any order.
The process of the invention comprises a processing step in which organic compounds are at least partly removed, and optionally recycled, such as an excess of phenol or formaldehyde that is used. A preferred way of at least partly removing these organic compounds is performing an extraction step with or without recycling the organic fraction back into the process. In the extraction the HBED product will for the major part be collected in the aqueous phase.
As indicated, the HBED product or derivative, such as the metal complex made from the HBED product, in some embodiments can be dried. The drying step can be performed by any drying method that a skilled person is aware of, such as drum drying, solvent evaporation, crystallization, spray drying, and in a preferred embodiment is a spray drying step.
Spray drying is preferably done in a spray drying apparatus to which the - in most instances aqueous - solution or slurry and the air are passed concurrently or countercurrently, with more preferably a temperature gradient between the aqueous solution and the incoming air in the range from 70 to 350°C, by atomizing the aqueous solution into fine liquid droplets.
The atomizing can be done by feeding an aqueous solution onto one or more disks which preferably rotate at a peripheral speed of >= 100 m/s, or by compressing it by means of a pump to a pressure of, in one embodiment, >= 20 bar absolute, preferably 40 to 60 bar and, at this pressure, feeding it into the drying apparatus via one or more jets. If nozzles are used, they are preferably a few mm in size, even more preferably between 2 and 3 mm. In a preferred embodiment, the atomizing occurs with addition of seeds, such as a crystalline fine dust, in the aqueous solution. The seeds in one embodiment have an upper limit for an average particle diameter lower by at least a factor of 2 than the lower limit of an average particle diameter of the powder obtained by the spray drying process. Preferably, the fraction of the seeds is from 0.1 to 50 % by weight, preferably 0.1 to 20% by weight, based on the weight of the powder obtained by the process.
Another advantage of the present invention is that when a drying step is added, such as in preferred embodiments a spray drying step, the process leads to solid materials with improved properties, like improved storage and handling properties, wherein the drying step itself also proceeds without any problems such as dusting, caking, uneven particle sizes, plugging of the spray nozzle. In further preferred embodiments the temperature during the process is between 0 and 60°C, preferably between 20 and 50°C, even more preferably between 30 and 50°C.
In yet other preferred embodiments of the process of the present invention the molar ratio of phenol : ethylenediamine diacetic acid (or a salt thereof) is higher than 8:1 , more preferably up to 20:1 ; most preferably it is between 10:1 and 14:1. It is also preferred to perform the reaction in phenol as a solvent, suitably in the substantial or full absence of other solvents than water. This makes it possible to avoid contamination with other compounds. The unreacted phenol can be recycled without any problems, so in a more preferred embodiment phenol is used as a (main) solvent and the process contains a step of recycling unreacted solvent.
Preferably, the molar ratio of formaldehyde : ethylenediamine diacetic acid (or a salt thereof) is between 1.8 : 1 and 2.2 : 1. More than 2.2 molar equivalents of formaldehyde will give side reactions with phenol (which is also preferably dosed in a molar excess). In yet another preferred embodiment it is ensured that the components, most importantly the EDDA, are fully dissolved in the reaction mixture during the process, which provides for a homogeneous reaction mixture that can be easily stirred and also leads to higher yields and less side products.
The invention is illustrated by the following Examples EXAMPLES In all Examples where it is indicated that components are used in a certain percentage, like 95% phenol, the remaining percents are water. In addition, all solutions are aqueous solutions.
Example 1 . HBED production and processing with 100% of alkali metal ions being potassium
44.7 g of a 45.8% potassium hydroxide solution (0.365 mole) were added to a slurry of 66.8 g of 99% ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid (0.375 mole) in 93.6 g of water. 54.4 g of a 41.0% formaldehyde solution (0.743 mole) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 minutes to obtain a clear solution. This solution was added in 30 minutes to 445.8 g of 95% phenol (4.50 moles) and the reaction mixture was stirred at 35°C for 24 h, during which time the pH increased from slightly below 6 to slightly above. After 24 h, ο,ο-HBED was obtained in 79.4% yield according to HPLC (EN 13368-2:2012).
The reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 76.1 g of water and 47.4 g of 45.8% potassium hydroxide solution (0.387 mole) The pH increased to about 9.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (250 ml and 3 times 125 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. The extracted aqueous ligand solution had a pH of about 10.5 and remained clear without the formation of any precipitates. The concentration of ο,ο-HBED in the extracted aqueous ligand solution was approximately 26% expressed as H4-o,o-HBED. Comparative example 1. Production of HBED and processing of HBED with 0% of the alkali metal ions being potassium
26.9 g of a 50.0% sodium hydroxide solution (0.336 mole) were added to a slurry of 62.3 g of 99% ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid (0.350 mole) in 131.3 g of water. 49.1 g of a 42.4% formaldehyde solution (0.693 mole) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for one hour to obtain a clear solution. This solution was added in one go to 444.7 g of 88.9% phenol (4.20 moles) and the container was washed with an additional 33.7 g of water. The reaction mixture was stirred at 35°C for 24 h, during which time the pH increased from about 5 to about 6. After 6 h, the ο,ο-HBED concentration was 10.85%, which corresponds to 59.7% yield. After 24 h, ο,ο-HBED was obtained in 83.2% yield according to HPLC (EN 13368-2:2012).
The reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 41.1 g of water and 33.5 g 50.0% NaOH (0.419 mole). The pH increased to about 9.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (250 ml and 3 times 125 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. The extracted aqueous ligand solution had a pH of about 10.5 and soon a large amount of precipitate was formed, which was identified as Na2H2-o,o-HBED. The remaining concentration of ο,ο-HBED in solution was approximately 6.1 % expressed as H4-o,o-HBED.
Increasing the pH from about 10.5 to about 12 with additional NaOH did not improve the solubility. Only after the addition of sufficient water to lower the concentration to approximately 6.2% expressed as H4-o,o-HBED was a clear solution obtained.
Comparative example 2. Production of HBED and processing of HBED with 30% of alkali metal ions being potassium 9.0 g of a 50.0% sodium hydroxide solution (0.1 13 mole) were added to a slurry of 20.8 g of 99% ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid (0.1 17 mole) in 46.1 g of water. 16.4 g of a 42.4% formaldehyde solution (0.232 mole) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for one hour to obtain a clear solution. This solution was added in one go to 148.6 g of 88.9% phenol (1.40 moles) and the container was washed with an additional 9.0 g of water. The reaction mixture was stirred at 35°C for 24 h, during which time the pH increased from about 5 to about 6. After 24 h, ο,ο-HBED was obtained in 81 .9% yield according to HPLC (EN 13368-2:2012).
The reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 21.2 g of 20.5% KOH (0.077 mole) and 20.7 g of 15.0% NaOH (0.078 mole). The pH increased to about 9.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (75 ml and 3 times 50 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. Quickly after the fourth extraction, the aqueous ligand solution turned turbid and a lot of product precipitated. 204.7 g of water were added to obtain a clear ligand solution again. The concentration of 0,0-HBED was reduced to 9.6% expressed as H4-o,o-HBED by the required dilution.
Comparative Example 3 Production of HBED and processing of HBED with 33% of alkali metal ions being potassium
15.5 g of a 47.0% potassium hydroxide solution (0.130 mole) were added to a slurry of 23.8 g of 99% ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid (0.134 mole) in 33.4 g of water. 17.9 g of a 44.4% formaldehyde solution (0.265 mole) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 minutes to obtain a clear solution. This solution was added in 30 minutes to 159.5 g of 95% phenol (1 .61 moles) and the reaction mixture was stirred at 35°C for 24 h, during which time the pH increased from slightly below 6 to slightly above. After 24 h, ο,ο-HBED was obtained in 80.4% yield according to HPLC (EN 13368-2:2012).
The reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 72.0 g of 14.9% sodium hydroxide solution (0.268 mole). The pH increased to about 10. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (100 ml and 3 times 50 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. The extracted aqueous ligand solution had a pH of about 12.5. Soon after the fourth extraction, the aqueous ligand solution turned turbid and a lot of product precipitated. Example 2. Production of HBED and processing of HBED with 50% of alkali metal ions being potassium
15.5 g of a 47.0% potassium hydroxide solution (0.130 mole) were added to a slurry of 23.8 g of 99% ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid (0.134 mole) in 33.4 g of water. 17.9 g of a 44.4% formaldehyde solution (0.265 mole) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 minutes to obtain a clear solution. This solution was added in 30 minutes to 159.4 g of 95% phenol (1 .61 moles) and the reaction mixture was stirred at 35°C for 24 h, during which time the pH increased from slightly below 6 to slightly above. After 24 h, ο,ο-HBED was obtained in 80.4% yield according to HPLC (EN 13368-2:2012).
The reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 18.0 g of 21.1 % potassium hydroxide solution (0.068 mole) and 53.9 g of 14.9% sodium hydroxide solution (0.201 mole). The pH increased to about 10.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (100 ml and 3 times 50 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. The extracted aqueous ligand solution had a pH of about 12.5. After the last extraction, the aqueous ligand solution became slightly turbid, but the solution could still be handled easily. The concentration of ο,ο-HBED in the extracted aqueous ligand solution was approximately 23% expressed as H4-o,o- HBED.
Example 3 Production of HBED and processing of HBED with 52% of alkali metal ions being potassium
30.7 g of a 20.5% potassium hydroxide solution (0.1 12 mole) were added to a slurry of 20.8 g of 99% ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid (0.1 17 mole) in 22.0 g of water. 16.5 g of a 42.4% formaldehyde solution (0.233 mole) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for one hour to obtain a clear solution. This solution was added in one go to 148.3 g of 88.9% phenol (1 .40 moles) and the container was washed with an additional 1 1.8 g of water. The reaction mixture was stirred at 35°C for 24 h, during which time the pH increased from about 5.5 to about 6. After 24 h, ο,ο-HBED was obtained in 83.4% yield according to HPLC (EN 13368-2:2012).
The reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 6.8 g of 20.5% KOH (0.025 mole) and 34.0 g of 15.0% NaOH (0.128 mole). The pH increased to about 9.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (75 ml and 3 times 50 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. After the last extraction, the aqueous ligand solution became slightly turbid, but the solution could still be handled easily. The concentration of ο,ο-HBED in the extracted aqueous ligand solution was approximately 22% expressed as H4-o,o-HBED.
Example 4 Production of HBED and processing of HBED with 58% of alkali metal ions being potassium 9.0 g of a 50.0% sodium hydroxide solution (0.1 13 mole) were added to a slurry of 20.8 g of 99% ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid (0.1 17 mole) in 46.1 g of water. 16.4 g of a 42.4% formaldehyde solution (0.232 mole) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for one hour to obtain a clear solution. This solution was added in one go to 148.6 g of 88.9% phenol (1.40 moles) and the container was washed with an additional 9.0 g of water. The reaction mixture was stirred at 35°C for 24 h, during which time the pH increased from about 5 to about 6. After 24 h, ο,ο-HBED was obtained in 81 .9% yield according to HPLC (EN 13368-2:2012).
The reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 42.3 g of 20.5% KOH (0.155 mole). The pH increased to about 9.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (75 ml and 3 times 50 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. The extracted aqueous ligand solution remained clear without the formation of any precipitates. The concentration of ο,ο-HBED in the extracted aqueous ligand solution was approximately 22% expressed as H4-o,o-HBED.
Example 5 Production of HBED and processing of HBED with 59% of alkali metal ions being potassium 30.7 g of a 20.5% potassium hydroxide solution (0.1 12 mole) were added to a slurry of 20.8 g of 99% ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid (0.1 17 mole) in 22.0 g of water. 16.5 g of a 42.4% formaldehyde solution (0.233 mole) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for one hour to obtain a clear solution. This solution was added in one go to 148.3 g of 88.9% phenol (1 .40 mole) and the container was washed with an additional 1 1.8 g of water. The reaction mixture was stirred at 35°C for 24 h, during which time the pH increased from about 5.5 to about 6. After 24 h, ο,ο-HBED was obtained in 83.4% yield according to HPLC (EN 13368-2:2012).
The reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 1 1.0 g of 20.5% KOH (0.040 mole) and 29.9 g of 15.0% NaOH (0.1 12 mole). The pH increased to about 9.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (75 ml and 3 times 50 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. The extracted aqueous ligand solution remained clear without the formation of any precipitates. The concentration of ο,ο-HBED in the extracted aqueous ligand solution was approximately 22% expressed as H4-o,o-HBED.
Example 6 Production of HBED and processing of HBED with 66% of alkali metal ions being potassium
15.5 g of a 47.0% potassium hydroxide solution (0.130 mole) were added to a slurry of 23.8 g of 99% ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid (0.134 mole) in 33.5 g of water. 17.9 g of a 44.4% formaldehyde solution (0.265 mole) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 30 minutes to obtain a clear solution. This solution was added in 30 minutes to 159.2 g of 95% phenol (1.61 moles) and the reaction mixture was stirred at 35°C for 24 h, during which time the pH increased from about 5.5 to about 6. After 24 h, ο,ο-HBED was obtained in 79.3% yield according to HPLC (EN 13368-2:2012).
The reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 35.7 g of 21.1 % potassium hydroxide solution (0.134 mole) and 36.1 g of 14.9% sodium hydroxide solution (0.134 mole). The pH increased to about 10.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (85 ml and 3 times 50 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. The extracted aqueous ligand solution had a pH of about 12.5 and remained clear without the formation of any precipitates. The concentration of o,o- HBED in the extracted aqueous ligand solution was approximately 22% expressed as H4-o,o-HBED
Example 7 Production of HBED and processing of HBED with 85% of alkali metal ions being potassium 30.7 g of a 20.5% potassium hydroxide solution (0.1 12 mole) were added to a slurry of 20.8 g of 99% ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid (0.1 17 mole) in 22.0 g of water. 16.5 g of a 42.4% formaldehyde solution (0.233 mole) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for one hour to obtain a clear solution. This solution was added in one go to 148.3 g of 88.9% phenol (1 .40 moles) and the container was washed with an additional 1 1.8 g of water. The reaction mixture was stirred at 35°C for 24 h, during which time the pH increased from about 5.5 to about 6. After 24 h, ο,ο-HBED was obtained in 83.4% yield according to HPLC (EN 13368-2:2012).
The reaction mixture was alkalized by the addition of 1 1.0 g of 20.5% KOH (0.040 mole) and 6.8 g of 15.0% NaOH (0.026 mole). The pH increased to about 8.5. Phenol was extracted from the reaction mixture with methyl isobutyl ketone (75 ml and 3 times 50 ml). Each time a fast and clear separation occurred between the aqueous ligand solution and the organic phase. The extracted aqueous ligand solution remained clear without the formation of any precipitates. The concentration of ο,ο-HBED in the extracted aqueous ligand solution was approximately 25% expressed as H4-o,o-HBED.
Example 8. Use of HBED products of the invention as a micronutrient A solution of 19.1 g of FeCI3.6H20 (0.071 mole) in 9.6 g of water (13.8% Fe m/m) was added to 100 g of the extracted HBED ligand solution from Example 7 (25% expressed as H4-o,o-HBED, 0.064 mole ο,ο-HBED). The pH of the solution was carefully adjusted to pH 8 with a 20.5% KOH solution. The resulting slurry was spray dried to obtain a solid containing 6.4% Fe chelated by o,o-HBED.
With this product, a fully randomized pot trial was performed in a greenhouse. Citrus medica Buddha's Hand was grown in 5-kg pots filled with a calcareous soil from Spain (pH(water) = 8.8; pH(0. oi M caci2) - 7.9). The dose rate was 5 mg Fe per pot (three replicates); no Fe was given to the control (six replicates). Compared to the control, the treated plants were significantly greener, longer, produced both more fresh and dry matter and had taken up more Fe.

Claims

Claims
1 . Process to prepare N,N'-di(2-hydroxybenzyl) ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid and salts thereof (HBED) comprising a reaction between formaldehyde, ethylenediamine diacetic acid or a salt thereof (EDDA) and phenol, wherein the reaction mixture contains 0.2 to 1.1 molar equivalents of alkali metal ions on the basis of the molar amount of EDDA and the reaction mixture is processed by a step in which at least part of the organic compounds other than the formed HBED are removed from the reaction mixture, and optionally recycled, during which step at least 50% and up to and including 100% of the alkali metal ions in the reaction mixture are potassium ions.
2. Process of claim 1 , wherein the reaction between formaldehyde, EDDA and phenol is performed at a pH of between 3 and 7 and a temperature below 60°C.
3. Process of claim 2, wherein the 0.2-1.1 equivalent of alkali metal ions on molar amount of EDDA is obtained by the addition of alkali metal hydroxide or by adding the EDDA as an ethylenediamine diacetate alkali metal salt or in an aqueous solution containing alkali metal ions.
4. Process of claim 2 or 3 comprising a first step wherein a reaction is performed between formaldehyde and ethylenediamine diacetic acid or a salt thereof to give an adduct and a second step wherein the adduct of formaldehyde and ethylenediamine diacetic acid or a salt thereof is reacted with phenol while ensuring that the pH is between 3 and 7 and the temperature is below 60°C.
5. Process of claim 2 or 3 comprising a first step of preparing a mixture comprising phenol and ethylenediamine diacetic acid or a salt thereof and a second step of reacting this mixture with formaldehyde at a pH of between 3 and 7 and a temperature of below 60°C.
6. Process of claim 2 or 3 comprising a first step of preparing a mixture comprising phenol and formaldehyde and a second step of reacting this mixture with ethylenediamine diacetic acid or a salt thereof at a pH of between 3 and 7 and a temperature of below 60°C.
7. Process of any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein in a step between the reaction between EDDA, phenol and formaldehyde and the processing step further alkali metal is added to the reaction mixture.
8. Process of claim 7, wherein the addition of further alkali metal increases the pH to a value higher than 7.
9. Process of any one of claims 1 to 8, wherein 60 to 100 mole % of the alkali metal in the reaction mixture during the processing step are potassium.
10. Process of any one of claims 1 to 9 containing an additional step wherein the product is converted to the acid, another salt or metal complex.
1 1 . Process of any one of claims 1 to 10 containing an additional drying step.
12. Process of claim 1 1 , wherein the drying step is a spray drying step.
13. Product obtainable by the process of any one of preceding claims 1 to 12, wherein at least 50 but less than 100 molar percent of the alkali metal ions are potassium.
14. Use of product of claim 13 in a micronutrient formulation.
PCT/EP2016/064501 2015-06-25 2016-06-23 Process to prepare phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds WO2016207266A1 (en)

Priority Applications (7)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PL16731168T PL3313813T3 (en) 2015-06-25 2016-06-23 Process to prepare phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds
MX2017016691A MX2017016691A (en) 2015-06-25 2016-06-23 Process to prepare phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds.
US15/736,372 US10472320B2 (en) 2015-06-25 2016-06-23 Process to prepare phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds
CN201680033895.6A CN107743480B (en) 2015-06-25 2016-06-23 Method for preparing phenol ethylenediamine diacetic acid compound
EP16731168.7A EP3313813B1 (en) 2015-06-25 2016-06-23 Process to prepare phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds
ES16731168T ES2733466T3 (en) 2015-06-25 2016-06-23 Process for preparing phenolic compounds of ethylenediamine diacetic acid
CA2989973A CA2989973C (en) 2015-06-25 2016-06-23 Process to prepare phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP15173800.2 2015-06-25
EP15173800 2015-06-25

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2016207266A1 true WO2016207266A1 (en) 2016-12-29

Family

ID=53488254

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2016/064501 WO2016207266A1 (en) 2015-06-25 2016-06-23 Process to prepare phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds

Country Status (9)

Country Link
US (1) US10472320B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3313813B1 (en)
CN (1) CN107743480B (en)
CA (1) CA2989973C (en)
ES (1) ES2733466T3 (en)
MX (2) MX2017016691A (en)
PL (1) PL3313813T3 (en)
TR (1) TR201909965T4 (en)
WO (1) WO2016207266A1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10093612B2 (en) 2015-06-25 2018-10-09 Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V. Process to prepare phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds
EP3848349A1 (en) 2020-12-01 2021-07-14 Przedsiebiorstwo Produkcyjno-Consultingowe ADOB Sp. z o.o. Sp. jawna A process for the preparation of salts of n,n'-disubstituted ethylenediamine-n,n'-diacetic acid derivatives and their use

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2967196A (en) 1955-12-06 1961-01-03 Geigy Chem Corp Ethylenediaminediacetic acids containing phenolic groups
US3632637A (en) 1968-02-13 1972-01-04 Arthur E Martell Hydroxyaryl-containing aminocarboxylic chelating agents
US4338460A (en) 1975-11-11 1982-07-06 W. R. Grace & Co. Process for preparing chelating agents
WO2001046114A1 (en) 1999-12-21 2001-06-28 Geltex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Method for making hbed
WO2009037235A1 (en) 2007-09-20 2009-03-26 Przedsiebiorstwo Produkcyjno-Consultingowe Adob Sp. Z O.O. Sp. K. A process for the preparation of n,n'-bis(2-hydroxybenzyl)ethylenediamine-n,n'-diacetic acid and its derivatives

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3366752D1 (en) 1982-04-29 1986-11-13 Eastman Kodak Co Stabilised photographic color developer compositions and processes
US5342604A (en) 1988-10-31 1994-08-30 The Dow Chemical Company Complexes possessing ortho ligating functionality
US5776894A (en) 1988-12-05 1998-07-07 Novartis Ag Chelated somatostatin peptides and complexes thereof, pharmaceutical compositions containing them and their use in treating tumors
CN1227006C (en) 1998-02-04 2005-11-16 佛罗里达大学研究基金会公司 Pharmaceuticals comprising N,N'-BIS(2-Hydroxybenzy) ethylenediamine-N, N'-diacetic acid for iron chelating therapy
US20070099132A1 (en) 2000-09-18 2007-05-03 Hajime Nakagawa Photothermographic material
US20040121273A1 (en) 2002-12-03 2004-06-24 Hajime Nakagawa Photothermographic material
JP4084645B2 (en) 2002-12-03 2008-04-30 富士フイルム株式会社 Photothermographic material
US7226728B2 (en) 2004-09-24 2007-06-05 Fujifilm Corporation Photothermographic material
JP4490382B2 (en) 2006-02-28 2010-06-23 富士フイルム株式会社 Thermal transfer image-receiving sheet and method for producing the same
JP2007229985A (en) 2006-02-28 2007-09-13 Fujifilm Corp Thermal transfer image receiving sheet
JP2007229988A (en) 2006-02-28 2007-09-13 Fujifilm Corp Thermal transfer image receiving sheet and its manufacturing method
JP2008273196A (en) 2007-03-30 2008-11-13 Fujifilm Corp Coating composition for thermosensitive transfer image receiving sheet and thermosensitive transfer image receiving sheet
JP4878327B2 (en) 2007-03-30 2012-02-15 富士フイルム株式会社 Thermal transfer image-receiving sheet and method for producing the same
PL2289869T3 (en) 2009-07-17 2012-09-28 Przed Produkcyjno Consultingowe Adob Sp Z O O Sp K A process for the preparation of Fe(III) chelates of N,N'-di(2-hydroxybenzyl)-ethylenediamine-N,N'-diacetic acid and its derivatives
GB201117187D0 (en) 2011-10-06 2011-11-16 Fujifilm Imaging Colorants Ltd A process for preparing a dispersion, dispersion, use and method
MX2017016399A (en) * 2015-06-25 2018-03-02 Akzo Nobel Chemicals Int Bv Process to prepare phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds.

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2967196A (en) 1955-12-06 1961-01-03 Geigy Chem Corp Ethylenediaminediacetic acids containing phenolic groups
US3632637A (en) 1968-02-13 1972-01-04 Arthur E Martell Hydroxyaryl-containing aminocarboxylic chelating agents
US4338460A (en) 1975-11-11 1982-07-06 W. R. Grace & Co. Process for preparing chelating agents
WO2001046114A1 (en) 1999-12-21 2001-06-28 Geltex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Method for making hbed
WO2009037235A1 (en) 2007-09-20 2009-03-26 Przedsiebiorstwo Produkcyjno-Consultingowe Adob Sp. Z O.O. Sp. K. A process for the preparation of n,n'-bis(2-hydroxybenzyl)ethylenediamine-n,n'-diacetic acid and its derivatives

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
J.G. WILSON: "phenolic analogues of aminocarboxylic acid ligands for Tc. 11* Synthesis and characterization of N,N'-ethylenebis[N-(o-hydroxybenzyl glycines)] ehbg", AUST J CHEM, vol. 41, 1988, pages 173 - 182
M A KEAN ET AL.: "Iron chelating agents and their effects on the growth of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Chlorella vulgaris, Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Spirulina platensis in comparison to Fe-EDTA", JOURNAL OF ALGAL BIOMASS UTILIZATION, vol. 6, no. 1, 1 January 2015 (2015-01-01), pages 56 - 73, XP055221657
M A KEAN ET AL: "Iron chelating agents and their effects on the growth of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Chlorella vulgaris, Phaeodactylum tricornutum and Spirulina platensis in comparison to Fe-EDTA", JOURNAL OF ALGAL BIOMASS UTILIZATION, 2015, 6 (1), 1 January 2015 (2015-01-01), pages 56 - 73, XP055221657, Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://jalgalbiomass.com/paper7vol6no1.pdf> [retrieved on 20151016] *

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10093612B2 (en) 2015-06-25 2018-10-09 Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V. Process to prepare phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds
EP3848349A1 (en) 2020-12-01 2021-07-14 Przedsiebiorstwo Produkcyjno-Consultingowe ADOB Sp. z o.o. Sp. jawna A process for the preparation of salts of n,n'-disubstituted ethylenediamine-n,n'-diacetic acid derivatives and their use

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2989973C (en) 2023-07-18
CN107743480B (en) 2020-07-17
EP3313813A1 (en) 2018-05-02
CN107743480A (en) 2018-02-27
US20180186727A1 (en) 2018-07-05
TR201909965T4 (en) 2019-07-22
EP3313813B1 (en) 2019-04-10
MX2022003400A (en) 2022-04-18
MX2017016691A (en) 2018-03-09
CA2989973A1 (en) 2016-12-29
ES2733466T3 (en) 2019-11-29
PL3313813T3 (en) 2019-10-31
US10472320B2 (en) 2019-11-12

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN101489970B (en) Method for producing succinic acid
EP3313813B1 (en) Process to prepare phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds
CN105461579A (en) Preparation method of imino-disuccinic acid and salt thereof
CN104892440A (en) Clean production method of glycine and derivatives thereof
US20120095261A1 (en) Process for preparation of alpha-ketoglutaric acid
CN104193634B (en) A kind of separation of ammonia guanidine-acetic acid and the method for ammonium chloride mixed crystal
CN106631813B (en) A kind of bronopol process for refining
CN108558687B (en) Method for catalytically synthesizing glycine in homogeneous system
CA2989972C (en) Process to prepare phenolic ethylenediamine diacetic acid compounds
CN101583586B (en) Improvement in synthesis of butylated hydroxyanisole from tertiary butyl hydroquinone
CN109400492B (en) Preparation method of tetrasodium aspartate diacetate
CN102503810A (en) Method for recovering and recycling L-tartaric acid
CN103739417A (en) Method for synthesizing aromatic primary amine in circulating water phase system
CN103547561A (en) Method for producing aminopolycarboxylates
WO2021180874A1 (en) Method for preparing benzamide compound
CN101270061B (en) Method for preparing glycine
CN107805222B (en) Comprehensive utilization method of allantoin synthetic mother liquor
CN112209821A (en) Preparation method of chromium propionate
CN101265183A (en) Method for preparing 2,3,4-trimethoxybenzoic acid
CN104557902A (en) New method for preparing thiabendazole
JP6983256B2 (en) Method for producing purified methionine
CN107879922A (en) A kind of circulation utilization method of the waste water containing KCl
CN114014811A (en) Preparation method of 1, 3-dimethylol-5, 5-dimethylhydantoin
CN110663823A (en) Preparation method of feed additive copper methionine
CN104370807B (en) The synthetic method of a kind of 6-hydroxyl-5-nitronicotinic acid and process for separation and purification thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 16731168

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

DPE1 Request for preliminary examination filed after expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2989973

Country of ref document: CA

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: MX/A/2017/016691

Country of ref document: MX

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2016731168

Country of ref document: EP