Résultats de recherche
g, a Statistical Myth - Less Wrong
lesswrong.com/lw/h6p/g_a_statistical_myth/Traduire cette page
11 avr. 2013 - Shalizi's argument seems to a refutation of a straw man. Vote up ... According to Shalizi's model, g factors reflect only the average or sum of the ...[LINK] stats.stackexchange.com question about Shalizi's ...
lesswrong.com/.../link_statsstackexchangecom_questi...Traduire cette page
16 mai 2012 - I've just skimmed Shalizi's paper, so I might be wrong, but it seems to ... Now Shalizi's response is that if you are a Bayesian then adding this ...Overview for smoofra - Less Wrong
lesswrong.com/user/smoofra/Traduire cette page
Here, Dalliard says that Shalizi claims the only evidence offered for "g" is (in ... know enough about any of that stuff to evaluate Dalliard's claims against Shalizi'sThe null model of science - Less Wrong
lesswrong.com/lw/4yw/the_null_model_of_science/ - Traduire cette page
26 mars 2011 - Cosma Shalizi (I think) said something, or pointed to something, about the null model of science - what science would look like if there were no ...Bayesian Flame - Less Wrong
lesswrong.com/lw/147/bayesian_flame/Traduire cette page
26 juil. 2009 - Another stick for the fire is provided by Shalizi, who (among other things) makes the correct point that a good Bayesian must never be uncertain ...Comments by smoofra - Less Wrong
lesswrong.com/user/smoofra/comments/ - Traduire cette page
Here, Dalliard says that Shalizi claims the only evidence offered for "g" is (in ... know enough about any of that stuff to evaluate Dalliard's claims against Shalizi'sOverview for Linking - Less Wrong
lesswrong.com/user/Linking/Traduire cette page
Shalizi alleges that there are tests that measure intelligence “in the ordinary ... but this appears to be false: I don't find any such allegation in Shalizi's article.New paper on Bayesian philosophy of statistics from ...
lesswrong.com/.../new_paper_on_bayesian_philosop...Traduire cette page
10 mars 2012 - I'm now struggling with the Gelman-Shalizi article (link). ... but it seems to me that Gelman and Shalizi are making some serious mistakes here.Frequentist Magic vs. Bayesian Magic - Less Wrong
lesswrong.com/.../frequentist_magic_vs_bayesian_ma...Traduire cette page
8 avr. 2010 - Consider the great anti-Bayesian Cosma Shalizi. .... The problem with the quoted argument from Shalizi is that it is describing a decrease in ...Math prerequisites for understanding LW stuff - Less Wrong
lesswrong.com/.../math_prerequisites_for_understand...Traduire cette page
4 oct. 2010 - See for example Cosma Shalizi's review (of special interest to Less ... It seems Shalizi's comments on Jaynes have been somewhat refuted.